Tim Ward Tim Ward's Profile Page

Tim Ward Tim Ward

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor적중율높은시험덤프공부, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor퍼펙트인증덤프자료

ExamPassdump는 한국어로 온라인상담과 메일상담을 받습니다. PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor덤프구매후 일년동안 무료업데이트서비스를 제공해드리며PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험에서 떨어지는 경우PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor덤프비용 전액을 환불해드려 고객님의 부담을 덜어드립니다. 더는 고민고민 하지마시고 덤프 받아가세요.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 인증은 전 세계적으로 인정받고 정보 자산의 보안을 보장하고자 하는 조직에서 높이 추구하는 인증입니다. 이 인증으로 최고 수준의 보안 기준을 유지하고 효과적인 ISMS를 구현하고 유지할 수 있는 능력을 증명할 수 있습니다.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor적중율 높은 시험덤프공부 <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor퍼펙트 인증덤프자료, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험대비 최신버전 덤프

고객님의 시간을 조금이라도 절약해드리고 공을 적게 들여도 자격증 취득이 쉬워지도록 ExamPassdump의 IT전문가들은 최신 실러버스에 따라 몇년간의 노하우와 경험을 충분히 활용하여PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험대비자료를 연구제작하였습니다. PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 덤프를 공부하여 시험에서 떨어지는 경우 덤프비용환불 혹은 다른 과목으로 교환하는중 한가지 서비스를 제공해드립니다.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 시험은 정보 보안 분야에서 일하는 개인의 지식과 기술을 검증하도록 설계되었습니다. 이 시험은 정보 보안 관리의 국제 표준인 ISO/IEC 27001에서 인증된 리드 감사관이 되기를 희망하는 사람들을 위한 것입니다. 이 시험은 정보 보안 분야에서 교육, 인증 및 감사 서비스를 제공하는 선두적인 글로벌 PECB(Professional Evaluation and Certification Board)에 의해 실시됩니다.

최신 ISO 27001 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 무료샘플문제 (Q26-Q31):

질문 # 26
Which option below is correct about the audit plan?

A. The audit plan should be flexible to allow for modifications
B. The audit plan involves the use of several audit procedures
C. The auditee's top management prepares the audit plan

정답：A

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
B . Correct Answer:
Audit plans must remain flexible to adapt to unforeseen findings and risks.
ISO 19011:2018 specifies that audit planning should allow dynamic adjustments.
A . Incorrect:
Audit procedures are part of execution, not planning.
C . Incorrect:
The audit team, not top management, prepares the audit plan.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 5.4 (Audit Planning Flexibility)

질문 # 27
Scenario 5: Cobt. an insurance company in London, offers various commercial, industrial, and life insurance solutions. In recent years, the number of Cobt's clients has increased enormously. Having a huge amount of data to process, the company decided that certifying against ISO/IEC 27001 would bring many benefits to securing information and show its commitment to continual improvement. While the company was well-versed in conducting regular risk assessments, implementing an ISMS brought major changes to its daily operations. During the risk assessment process, a risk was identified where significant defects occurred without being detected or prevented by the organizations internal control mechanisms.
The company followed a methodology to implement the ISMS and had an operational ISMS in place after only a few months After successfully implementing the ISMS, Cobt applied for ISO/IEC 27001 certification Sarah, an experienced auditor, was assigned to the audit Upon thoroughly analyzing the audit offer, Sarah accepted her responsibilities as an audit team leader and immediately started to obtain general information about Cobt She established the audit criteria and objective, planned the audit, and assigned the audit team members' responsibilities.
Sarah acknowledged that although Cobt has expanded significantly by offering diverse commercial and insurance solutions, it still relies on some manual processes Therefore, her initial focus was to gather information on how the company manages its information security risks Sarah contacted Cobt's representatives to request access to information related to risk management for the off-site review, as initially agreed upon for part of the audit However, Cobt later refused, claiming that such information is too sensitive to be accessed outside of the company This refusal raised concerns about the audit's feasibility, particularly regarding the availability and cooperation of the auditee and access to evidence Moreover, Cobt raised concerns about the audit schedule, stating that it does not properly reflect the recent changes the company made It pointed out that the actions to be performed during the audit apply only to the initial scope and do not encompass the latest changes made in the audit scope Sarah also evaluated the materiality of the situation, considering the significance of the information denied for the audit objectives. In this case, the refusal by Cobt raised questions about the completeness of the audit and its ability to provide reasonable assurance. Following these situations, Sarah decided to withdraw from the audit before a certification agreement was signed and communicated her decision to Cobt and the certification body. This decision was made to ensure adherence to audit principles and maintain transparency, highlighting her commitment to consistently upholding these principles.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Based on the role of Sarah described in Scenario 5, which of the following should NOT be part of her responsibilities?

A. Assigning responsibilities to the audit team members
B. Defining the audit criteria and objectives
C. Planning the audit

정답：A

설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Assigning responsibilities to the audit team members (Correct Answer) - This is not Sarah's responsibility. The certification body assigns the audit team and defines responsibilities, ensuring independence and objectivity.
B . Defining the audit criteria and objectives (Correct Responsibility) - Sarah, as the audit team leader, must establish audit criteria and objectives, per ISO 19011 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems).
C . Planning the audit (Correct Responsibility) - The audit team leader is responsible for planning the audit, including timelines and resource allocation.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 9.2 (Internal Audit)

질문 # 28
You are the audit team leader conducting a third-party audit of an online insurance company. During Stage 1, you found that the organization took a very cautious risk approach and included all the information security controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Appendix A in their Statement of Applicability.
During the Stage 2 audit, your audit team found that there was no evidence of a risk treatment plan for the implementation of the three controls (5.3 Segregation of duties, 6.1 Screening, 7.12 Cabling security). You raise a nonconformity against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO 27001:2022.
At the closing meeting, the Technical Director issues an extract from an amended Statement of Applicability (as shown) and asks for the nonconformity to be withdrawn.

Select three options of the correct responses of an audit team leader to the request of the Technical Director.

A. Advise the Technical Director that the nonconformity must stand since the evidence obtained for it was clear.
B. State that a follow up audit will be necessary to review the evidence for the updated Statement of Applicability.
C. Review the documentation produced and withdraw the nonconformity.
D. Inform the Technical Director that the nonconformity will be changed to an Opportunity for Improvement.
E. Advise management that the information provided will be reviewed when the auditors have more time.
F. Advise the Technical Director that once a nonconformity is raised it cannot be withdrawn.
G. Ask the auditor who raised the issue for their opinion on how you should respond to the request.
H. Advise the Technical Director that his request will be included in the audit report.

정답：A,B,H

설명：
Explanation
The three options of the correct responses of an audit team leader to the request of the Technical Director are:
B: Advise the Technical Director that his request will be included in the audit report.
D: Advise the Technical Director that the nonconformity must stand since the evidence obtained for it was clear.
H: State that a follow up audit will be necessary to review the evidence for the updated Statement of Applicability.
B: This response is correct because the audit team leader should document the request of the Technical Director and include it in the audit report, along with the audit findings and conclusions12. This will ensure transparency and traceability of the audit process and the audit results.
D: This response is correct because the audit team leader should not withdraw the nonconformity based on the amended Statement of Applicability alone. The nonconformity was raised against clause 6.1.3.e of ISO 27001:2022, which requires the organisation to produce and maintain a risk treatment plan that defines how the information security risks are treated, including the controls selected and their implementation status34. The Statement of Applicability is only one part of the risk treatment plan, and it does not provide sufficient evidence that the controls have been implemented effectively. The audit team leader should base the nonconformity on the objective evidence obtained during the audit, not on the subjective claims of the auditee12.
H: This response is correct because the audit team leader should state that a follow up audit will be necessary to review the evidence for the updated Statement of Applicability. A follow up audit is an audit that is conducted after a previous audit to verify the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective actions and/or opportunities for improvement that were agreed upon as a result of the previous audit56. The follow up audit should seek to ensure that the nonconformity has been effectively addressed and that the ISMS is compliant and effective. The follow up audit should also consider any new or changed risks or requirements that may affect the ISMS56.
References:
1: PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 25 2: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 6.1.3.e 4: ISO/IEC
27005:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security risk management, clause
8.3.2 5: PECB Candidate Handbook - ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 25 6: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.7

질문 # 29
__________ is a software used or created by hackers to disrupt computer operation, gather sensitive information, or gain access to private computer systems.

A. Trojan
B. Malware
C. Operating System
D. Virus

정답：B

설명：
Malware is a software used or created by hackers to disrupt computer operation, gather sensitive information, or gain access to private computer systems. Malware is a general term that covers various types of malicious software, such as viruses, worms, trojans, ransomware, spyware, adware, etc. Malware can cause serious damage to the organization's information assets and reputation, and may lead to legal or regulatory consequences. Therefore, the organization should implement appropriate controls to prevent, detect and remove malware, as specified in ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 12.2.1. Reference: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, What is malware?

질문 # 30
You are performing an ISMS audit at a residential nursing home that provides healthcare services and are reviewing the Software Code Management (SCM) system. You found a total of 10 user accounts on the SCM. You confirm that one of the users, Scott, resigned 9-months ago. The SCM System Administrator confirmed Scott's last check-out of the source code was found 1 month ago. He was using one of the uthorized desktops from the local network in a secure area.
You check with the user de-registration procedure which states "Managers have to make sure of deregistration of the user account and authorisation immediately from the relevant ICT system and/or equipment after resignation approval." There was no deregistration record for user Scott.
The IT Security Manager explains that Scott still comes back to the office every month after he resigned to provide support on source code maintenance. That's why his account on SCM still exists.
You would like to investigate other areas further to collect more audit evidence. Select three options that would not be valid audit trails.

A. Collect more evidence on how Scott can access the secure are
a. (Relevant to control A.8.4)
B. Collect more evidence on how access controls are periodically reviewed to maintain security (Relevant to control A.5.35)
C. Collect more evidence of why Scott resigned and whether his re-engagement represents a conflict of interest. (relevant to control A.5.3)
D. Collect more evidence on how the transition of Scott from full-time to part-time employment was managed (relevant to control A.6.5)
E. Collect more evidence on where Scott kept the source code that he checked out and how it was secured. (Relevant to control A.8.4)
F. Collect more evidence from Scott's background verification checks performed by the human resource department under the new employment relationship. (Relevant to control A.6.1)
G. Collect more evidence on how Scott can access the employee's desktop and local network. (Relevant to control A.5.15)
H. Collect more evidence on how the organization pays for Scott's source code maintenance support service. (Relevant to control A.6.2)

정답：C,D,H

설명：
The options B, D, and G are not valid audit trails because they are not directly related to the ISMS requirements or the audit criteria. They are more relevant to the human resource management or the contractual arrangements of the organization, which are outside the scope of the ISMS audit. The other options are valid audit trails because they can provide evidence of how the organization implements and maintains the ISMS controls related to access control, secure areas, and information security aspects of business continuity management. Reference:
PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 16, section 4.2.1 ISO/IEC 27001:2013, clauses A.5.3, A.5.15, A.5.35, A.6.1, A.6.2, A.6.5, A.8.4, A.17.1 ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.2.2

질문 # 31
......

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor퍼펙트 인증덤프자료: https://www.exampassdump.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor_valid-braindumps.html